For some strange reason, I was actually awake early this morning. I spent some time perusing through my Twitter timeline, not really paying close attention to what was being tweeted, but enough for a tweet to catch my attention. Hart Hanson, creator of Bones, posted a link to a video of Stephen Fry’s speech at one of the Intelligence² Debates (“The Catholic Church is a force of good in the world”), along with his personal introduction of one of his close friends: “As you can see there is no such thing as dull conversation with this big brained and lovely man.” I would like to add emphasis on lovely, because Mister Fry is absolutely one of the most loveliest men I’ve ever had the luck to briefly converse with (ah, the wonders of Twitter). He is also incredibly intelligent and wonderfully clever and witty – believe me, if you’ve see any clips from A Bit of Fry and Laurie, then you’re missing out on some of the best of British humour (yes with a U!) I’ve ever had the pleasure to see. If you don’t believe me, you should check out this video: Language Conversation/Beauty and Ideas. The word play, absolutely ace. But that’s not the point of this entry.
Anyway, Stephen Fry. In this video, he opposed the motion that the Catholic Church is not a force for good in the world and I’m inclined to agree. What is the most amazing thing about his speech is despite the fact that he was arguing against the Church, he does so with a manner filled with love and respect. He has no contempt, nor quarrel or argument against any individuals in the Church. He talks about how the Church attacks the Enlightenment; about how people were burned and tortured in London just for reading the Bible in English. He spoke of Thomas More, how he was one of the main principle burners and tortures of people, about how last century he was made a saint, and in 2000, he was made the patron saint of politicians. A man who burned and tortured people for owning the Bible in their own language. He also spoke about, as a gay man, how it’s a bit hard for him to be accused of being “morally evil” and “perverted” simply because he is gay. He also found it strange to be called that when that institution has done everything in it’s power and more to hush up the child abuse and rape scandals going on. He also finds it strange to be called a pervert by sexually dysfunctional people: “Let’s imagine that we can overlook this and say it has nothing whatever to do with the structure and nature of the Catholic church and the twisted and neurotic and hysterical way that its leaders are chosen, the celibacy, the nuns, the monks, the priesthood: this is not natural and normal, ladies and gentlemen, in 2009. It really isn’t.“
Lastly, he speaks about a subject that is very dear to him: AIDS in Africa, especially Uganda. Uganda once had the worst incidence of HIV/AIDS in the world. There was an initiative called ABC: Abstinence, Be Faithful, and Correct use of Condoms that helped to lower the HIV/AIDS rate. He does not deny that abstinence is a very good way of not getting AIDS, as well as staying faithful to one’s partner. But he also emphatically defends the use of condoms because they work just as well as the other two. He goes on to say how the Pope is not just satisfied with saying how condoms are against their religion, he goes on to lie about how they actually help spread the disease, rather than protect against it. He ends on the question of whether Jesus, if he was around now, if he would have approved of the Church, with it’s pomp and circumstance, with it’s wealth and wheedling apologies. He thinks that until the Church apologizes and returns the art and money from the countries they once raped and violated, until they actually focus on essence of their belief, only then could he say that the Church may well be a force of good in the world.

‘IT’S A LITTLE HARD FOR ME TO KNOW THAT I AM DISORDERED OR AGAIN, TO QUOTE RATZINGER, THAT I AM GUILTY OF A MORAL SIN SIMPLY FOR FULFILLING MY SEXUAL DESTINY AS I SEE IT. IT’S HARD FOR ME TO BE TOLD THAT, BE TOLD THAT I’M EVIL BECAUSE I THINK OF MYSELF AS SOMEONE WHO IS FILLED WITH LOVE. WHOSE ONLY PURPOSE IN LIFE WAS TO ACHIEVE LOVE AND WHO FEELS LOVE FOR SOME MUCH OF NATURE AND THE WORLD AND FOR EVERYTHING ELSE AND, TO LIKE ANYBODY DECENT WITH AN EDUCATION REALIZES THAT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND RECEIVE LOVE, IT’S A STRUGGLE. IT’S NOT ONE THAT DOES NOT NEED A POPE TO TELL YOU HOW TO DO IT. IT CERTAINLY ISN’T ONE THAT NEEDS A POPE TO TELL YOU THAT YOU’RE EVIL. WITH 6 PERCENT OF ALL TEENAGE SUICIDE BEING GAY TEENAGE SUICIDES, WE CERTAINLY DON’T NEED THE STIGMATISATION, THE VICTIMISATION THAT LEADS TO PLAYGROUND BULLYING WHEN PEOPLE SAY: ‘YOU’RE A DISORDERED, MORALLY EVIL INDIVIDUAL.’ THAT’S NOT NICE, IT ISN’T NICE.’
Why do I feel so strongly about all of this? Well, for a number of reasons. I grew up in a strictly Roman Catholic family. I once made a remark about converting to Buddhism to my parents as we drove by Wat Thai in North Hollywood. The only thing my dad said was “don’t even think about it.” After I graduated 8th grade (just the phrasing of that amuses me), I’ve since drifted away from faith and religion. My mom was diagnosed with cancer in August of 2007. People kept telling me that they were praying for my mom. It was a sentiment I was grateful for, they were doing something that I found myself unable to do.
The truth is, I don’t know what I am. Am I atheist? Possibly. But there’s something holding me back from completely letting go of what I am used to, from completely believing that there is absolutely no higher being at all. I was a baby, I dragged my leg whenever I crawled. Doctors said the only way to fix my leg was surgery – my parents refused. So they prayed and prayed, taking a drive down to the mission at San Juan Capistrano twice a month or so to pray at St. Peregrine’s chapel. God knows how long they did it, but it worked. I didn’t need the surgery. I became the happy (right.) and athletic girl everyone knew me as for the first 13 years of my life.
So what is it? Agnostic? There’s that. But I remember the problem of evil that we talked about in my philosophy class, and once again, the great Stephen Fry said it better than I ever can:

Enter Morgan Enos, a 17-year-old, self releasing musician who never ceases to amaze me. His music captivates me and his grasp on words (reminding me of, but not quite like the great Stephen Fry) is ace. He’s an amazing lyricst for his age, as seen here in the first couple of lines from a song off his
to this record on a turntable with my headphones. Actually, looking for a video to link to this song lead me to Lee Ritenour performing a guitar cover of this song and let me tell you, I absolutely love it right now. It’s not quite the same, but it’s still appealing to my inner jazz lover. Enter Jeff Beck with Jools Holland, playing a blues guitar (with piano & band) cover of Ray Charles’s 


